Gigabyte G5 KD 好用吗

有一个可更换的电池。 技嘉G5 KC的起价约为1,000欧元（约合1,184美元），它旨在通过NvidiaGeForce RTX 3060和非常好的可升级性赢得玩家的青睐。我们的审查将揭示这一点的效果如何。

目錄 Show

Display Response Times
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Pricecompare

Windows Laptop / Notebook Geforce Gaming Comet Lake

Processor

Intel Core i5-10500H 6 x 2.5 - 4.5 GHz, 135 W PL2 / Short Burst, 55 W PL1 / Sustained, Comet Lake-H

Graphics adapter

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU - 6 GB VRAM, Core: 1425 MHz, Memory: 1750 MHz, 105 W TDP ( including 15 W Dynamic Boost), Dynamic Boost 2.0, Resizable BAR, Optimus, NVIDIA 471.41, UHD Graphics 630

Display

15.60 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, LM156LF-1F02, IPS, glossy: no, 144 Hz

Storage

ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4, 512 GB

, 450 GB free

Soundcard

Intel Comet Lake PCH-H - cAVS

Connections

1 USB 2.0, 1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 1x mic in, 1 headset out, Card Reader: SD

Networking

Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.2

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 28 x 361 x 258

Battery

48.96 Wh Lithium-Ion

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: 0.9 MP, 16:9 (1280x720)

Additional features

Speakers: 2x 2 W, Keyboard: chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, Gigabyte Control Center 3.0, Nahimic Companion, 24 Months Warranty

Weight

2.13 kg, Power Supply: 500 g

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
80.7 %	09/2021	Gigabyte G5 KC i5-10500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	2.1 kg	28 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
81.1 %	08/2021	Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ i5-11300H, GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU	2.6 kg	25 mm	17.30"	1920x1080
80.4 %	05/2021	MSI GF65 Thin 10UE i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	1.9 kg	21.7 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
		Dell G5 15 5500 09E2 i5-10300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile	2.3 kg	21.6 mm	15.60"	1920x1080

技嘉G5 KC的外壳是由坚固的塑料制成的，它既能保护基本单元，又能保护游戏笔记本的盖子不受扭曲。屏幕可以向后折叠约135度，它被铰链牢牢地保持在各自的位置。建造质量很好，我们无法发现任何不均匀的缝隙尺寸或类似情况。

G5的一个独特功能是，电池可以在底部取出，不需要任何工具。你只需要松开锁，然后就可以更换电池。

G5的占地面积与其他15英寸笔记本电脑相似。然而，它明显比我们测试领域的其他设备要厚。不过，在大约2.1公斤的重量上，它又一次进入了中场。

Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ Gigabyte G5 KC Dell G5 15 5500 09E2 MSI GF65 Thin 10UE ❌

404 mm280 mm25 mm2.6 kg361 mm258 mm28 mm2.1 kg365.5 mm 254 mm21.6 mm2.3 kg359 mm254 mm21.7 mm1.9 kg

Gigabyte G5 KC有一系列令人尊敬的端口。这些端口包括一个千兆LAN端口和一个Mini DisplayPort。由于一些接口，包括电源，被放置在背面，你不应该指望连接的电缆造成太多的拥堵。

使用我们的128GB AV PRO microSD V60参考存储卡，技嘉G5实现了77MB/s的复制数据和87MB/s的读取数据的合格结果。此外，G5是我们测试领域中唯一带有SD卡读卡器的游戏笔记本电脑。

技嘉G5 KC有一个千兆网口，能够通过蓝牙5.2以及Wi-Fi 6建立无线连接。将后者与我们的Netgear Nighthawk AX12参考路由器结合使用，我们接收数据的平均速度为1,388 Mb/s，发送数据的速度为1,520 Mb/s。这使得这款游戏笔记本在我们的测试领域中占据了第一位。

050100150200 250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100115012001250130013501400145015001550 Tooltip

; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1365 (695-1450)

; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1530 (1393-1595)

技嘉G5也像最近的大多数笔记本电脑一样配备了一个低分辨率的90万像素网络摄像头。图像质量也相应地很平庸，即使在良好的照明条件下，主体也会显得模糊不清，颜色也很苍白。

7.2 ∆E

12.5 ∆E

12.9 ∆E

7.1 ∆E

13.3 ∆E

10.8 ∆E

8.2 ∆E

16.1 ∆E

12.5 ∆E

10.5 ∆E

7.3 ∆E

5.7 ∆E

8.6 ∆E

10.7 ∆E

11.9 ∆E

3.5 ∆E

13.3 ∆E

15.1 ∆E

1.8 ∆E

12.5 ∆E

14 ∆E

12.9 ∆E

9.2 ∆E

7.6 ∆E

ColorChecker Gigabyte G5 KC: 10.21 ∆E min: 1.76 - max: 16.11 ∆E

除了电池可以在没有工具的情况下更换外，必要时技嘉G5的键盘也可以更换。卸下底部的众多螺丝，还可以接触到两个内存插槽、两个SSD插槽和一个空闲的2.5英寸驱动器插槽。这里也可以更换WLAN模块。

Gigabyte为G5 KC提供了24个月的保修期。

键盘

技嘉G5的键盘提供了清晰的反馈，很适合输入较长的文字。有一个全尺寸的数字键盘，而方向键也是按标准尺寸制作的。此外，大多数特殊键都是以单键形式提供的，这就避免了键盘上有过多的具有辅助功能的按键。

此外，技嘉还集成了一个键盘背光，确保按键上的标签有一个统一的照明。然而，用户不能自己选择颜色，因为他们只能从预定义的调色板中选择颜色，这意味着你不能设置白色背光，例如。

在G5 KC中，有一个带有分离式鼠标按钮的经典触摸板可作为鼠标的替代品。它很适合用于导航鼠标指针。然而，当通过触摸来触发鼠标点击时，触摸板的反应有点迟钝。然而，两个鼠标按钮被可靠地触发，并能发出声音，尽管它们的反馈有点软。

屏幕出血

技嘉G5 KC的屏幕由15.6英寸的IPS面板组成，提供1920x1080像素的分辨率和165Hz的刷新率。平均最大亮度为275cd/m²，是我们测试领域中最高的。不过，86%的亮度分布是平均水平。

此外，没有使用PWM进行亮度控制，这意味着眼睛敏感的用户在使用时不必担心任何困难。除了这里使用的显示屏外，还有一个配备240赫兹面板的游戏笔记本版本。


295 cd/m²	287 cd/m²	274 cd/m²
274 cd/m²	295 cd/m²	263 cd/m²
264 cd/m²	264 cd/m²	255 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

LM156LF-1F02

X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 295 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 274.6 cd/m² Minimum: 14 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 86 %
Center on Battery: 295 cd/m²
Contrast: 1283:1 (Black: 0.23 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.21 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.3, calibrated: 1.73
ΔE Greyscale 9.4 | 0.57-98 Ø5.5
69.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
96.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
68.2% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.046

	Gigabyte G5 KC LM156LF-1F02, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60	Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ BOE NV173FHM-NX4 (BOE09B4), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30	MSI GF65 Thin 10UE AU Optronics B156HAN08.4, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60	Dell G5 15 5500 09E2 AU Optronics B156HAN, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Display		-45%	-44%	-45%
Display P3 Coverage	68.2	36.7 -46%	37.65 -45%	36.73 -46%
sRGB Coverage	96.7	55 -43%	56.3 -42%	55.3 -43%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	69.6	37.9 -46%	38.9 -44%	37.95 -45%
Response Times		-115%	-236%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	10 ?(5.2, 4.8)	24.8 ?(12.4, 12.4) -148%	36.8 ?(19.2, 17.6) -268%
Response Time Black / White *	10.4 ?(5.2, 5.2)	18.8 ?(10.8, 8) -81%	31.6 ?(18.4, 13.2) -204%
PWM Frequency
Screen		-15%	-12%	-18%
Brightness middle	295	286 -3%	266.5 -10%	285.4 -3%
Brightness	275	261 -5%	262 -5%	260 -5%
Brightness Distribution	86	83 -3%	91 6%	86 0%
Black Level *	0.23	0.23 -0%	0.18 22%	0.19 17%
Contrast	1283	1243 -3%	1481 15%	1502 17%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	5.21	4.92 6%	5.33 -2%	5.35 -3%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	14.03	19.29 -37%	18.28 -30%	18.48 -32%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	1.73	4.73 -173%	4.36 -152%	5.3 -206%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	9.4	1.9 80%	4.5 52%	4.2 55%
Gamma	2.046 108%	2.175 101%	2.35 94%	2.2 100%
CCT	8002 81%	6782 96%	6289 103%	7627 85%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)			35.6	37.95
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)			55.8	55.26
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-58% / -36%	-97% / -51%	-32% / -25%

* ... smaller is better

根据我们的测量，技嘉G5的面板提供了1,283:1的良好对比度和0.23 cd/m²的同样良好的黑色水平。因此，颜色之间有很好的分离，黑色的图像内容只显示最小的灰色面纱。色彩空间覆盖率分别为96.7%（sRGB）和69.6%（AdobeRGB），是我们测试领域中最高的。

CalMAN的分析还显示，在显示色彩时，蓝色的比例过高。然而，这几乎可以通过校准来完全纠正。相应的ICC文件可以在位于顶部的窗口中下载，在显示器亮度分布图的右侧。

Gigabyte的游戏笔记本电脑只能在户外使用，只要在阴凉处的地方是首选。显示器的亮度不够高，不能在阳光直射下清晰地呈现图像内容。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
10.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 5.2 ms rise
↘ 5.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.4 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 18 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (22.8 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 5.2 ms rise
↘ 4.8 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.25 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 14 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (36 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 19625 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

G5 KC的IPS面板具有很好的视角稳定性，即使从平坦的角度观看图像内容也不会出现色彩失真。

视角稳定性

Gigabyte将G5 KC作为预算的入门级游戏笔记本电脑进行销售。然而，他们仍然确保硬件能够顺利地运行所有最新的游戏。除了我们的测试配置外，这款笔记本电脑还有更强的处理器可供选择。这里安装的NvidiaGeForce RTX 3060，一直作为显卡使用。

065130195260 325390455520585650715780845910975 1040110511701235 Tooltip

Gigabyte G5 KC Intel Core i5-10500H: Ø1133 (1111.57-1288.95)

Dell G5 15 5500 09E2 Intel Core i5-10300H: Ø781 (767.11-794.98)

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (79.2 - 282, n=217, last 2 years)	235 Points ∼100% +25%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ Intel Core i5-11300H	211 Points ∼90% +12%
MSI GF65 Thin 10UE Intel Core i7-10750H	202 Points ∼86% +7%
Gigabyte G5 KC Intel Core i5-10500H	188 Points ∼80%
Dell G5 15 5500 09E2 Intel Core i5-10300H	187.3 Points ∼80% 0%
Average Intel Core i5-10500H (184.5 - 188, n=2)	186.3 Points ∼79% -1%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (400 - 3652, n=223, last 2 years)	2108 Points ∼100% +64%
Gigabyte G5 KC Intel Core i5-10500H	1289 (1111.57min - 1288.95max) Points ∼61%
Average Intel Core i5-10500H (1209 - 1289, n=2)	1249 Points ∼59% -3%
MSI GF65 Thin 10UE Intel Core i7-10750H	1098 (1079.56min - 1097.57max) Points ∼52% -15%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ Intel Core i5-11300H	989 (953.06min - 988.73max) Points ∼47% -23%
Dell G5 15 5500 09E2 Intel Core i5-10300H	795 (767.11min - 794.98max) Points ∼38% -38%

Cinebench R23
Single Core
Average of class Gaming (527 - 1936, n=212, last 2 years)	1543 Points ∼100% +33%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ Intel Core i5-11300H	1426 Points ∼92% +23%
MSI GF65 Thin 10UE Intel Core i7-10750H	1248 Points ∼81% +7%
Gigabyte G5 KC Intel Core i5-10500H	1161 Points ∼75%
Average Intel Core i5-10500H (1158 - 1161, n=2)	1160 Points ∼75% 0%
Dell G5 15 5500 09E2 Intel Core i5-10300H	1147 Points ∼74% -1%
Multi Core
Average of class Gaming (2435 - 23482, n=213, last 2 years)	13099 Points ∼100% +92%
Average Intel Core i5-10500H (6820 - 7387, n=2)	7104 Points ∼54% +4%
MSI GF65 Thin 10UE Intel Core i7-10750H	6921 (6730.84min - 6920.58max) Points ∼53% +1%
Gigabyte G5 KC Intel Core i5-10500H	6820 Points ∼52%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ Intel Core i5-11300H	6581 Points ∼50% -4%
Dell G5 15 5500 09E2 Intel Core i5-10300H	5106 Points ∼39% -25%

Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Gaming (169 - 745, n=224, last 2 years)	594 Points ∼100% +32%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ Intel Core i5-11300H	546 Points ∼92% +21%
MSI GF65 Thin 10UE Intel Core i7-10750H	483 Points ∼81% +7%
Gigabyte G5 KC Intel Core i5-10500H	450 Points ∼76%
Average Intel Core i5-10500H (446 - 450, n=2)	448 Points ∼75% 0%
Dell G5 15 5500 09E2 Intel Core i5-10300H	445 Points ∼75% -1%
CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Gaming (930 - 9042, n=224, last 2 years)	4973 Points ∼100% +66%
Gigabyte G5 KC Intel Core i5-10500H	2996 Points ∼60%
Average Intel Core i5-10500H (2842 - 2996, n=2)	2919 Points ∼59% -3%
MSI GF65 Thin 10UE Intel Core i7-10750H	2673 Points ∼54% -11%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ Intel Core i5-11300H	2533 Points ∼51% -15%
Dell G5 15 5500 09E2 Intel Core i5-10300H	1954 Points ∼39% -35%

Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Dell G5 15 5500 09E2 Intel Core i5-10300H	537 Seconds * ∼100% -38%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ Intel Core i5-11300H	466 Seconds * ∼87% -20%
MSI GF65 Thin 10UE Intel Core i7-10750H	403 Seconds * ∼75% -4%
Gigabyte G5 KC Intel Core i5-10500H	389 Seconds * ∼72%
Average Intel Core i5-10500H (382 - 389, n=2)	386 Seconds * ∼72% +1%
Average of class Gaming (144 - 1259, n=223, last 2 years)	269 Seconds * ∼50% +31%

7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4 -mmt1
Average of class Gaming (2685 - 6582, n=220, last 2 years)	5549 MIPS ∼100% +13%
MSI GF65 Thin 10UE Intel Core i7-10750H	5209 MIPS ∼94% +6%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ Intel Core i5-11300H	4969 MIPS ∼90% +1%
Gigabyte G5 KC Intel Core i5-10500H	4897 MIPS ∼88%
Average Intel Core i5-10500H (4874 - 4897, n=2)	4886 MIPS ∼88% 0%
Dell G5 15 5500 09E2 Intel Core i5-10300H	4839 MIPS ∼87% -1%
7z b 4
Average of class Gaming (11386 - 88128, n=220, last 2 years)	54793 MIPS ∼100% +66%
Average Intel Core i5-10500H (33075 - 33815, n=2)	33445 MIPS ∼61% +1%
MSI GF65 Thin 10UE Intel Core i7-10750H	33084 MIPS ∼60% 0%
Gigabyte G5 KC Intel Core i5-10500H	33075 MIPS ∼60%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ Intel Core i5-11300H	25564 MIPS ∼47% -23%
Dell G5 15 5500 09E2 Intel Core i5-10300H	23493 MIPS ∼43% -29%

Geekbench 5.4
Single-Core
Average of class Gaming (158 - 1949, n=216, last 2 years)	1553 Points ∼100% +28%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ Intel Core i5-11300H	1400 Points ∼90% +15%
MSI GF65 Thin 10UE Intel Core i7-10750H	1310 Points ∼84% +8%
Gigabyte G5 KC Intel Core i5-10500H	1214 Points ∼78%
Gigabyte G5 KC Intel Core i5-10500H	1214 Points ∼78% 0%
Dell G5 15 5500 09E2 Intel Core i5-10300H	1202 Points ∼77% -1%
Average Intel Core i5-10500H (1181 - 1214, n=4)	1202 Points ∼77% -1%
Multi-Core
Average of class Gaming (1946 - 16925, n=216, last 2 years)	9534 Points ∼100% +51%
MSI GF65 Thin 10UE Intel Core i7-10750H	6355 Points ∼67% 0%
Gigabyte G5 KC Intel Core i5-10500H	6332 Points ∼66%
Gigabyte G5 KC Intel Core i5-10500H	6332 Points ∼66% 0%
Average Intel Core i5-10500H (5550 - 6340, n=4)	6139 Points ∼64% -3%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ Intel Core i5-11300H	4593 Points ∼48% -27%
Dell G5 15 5500 09E2 Intel Core i5-10300H	4314 Points ∼45% -32%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Average of class Gaming (3 - 26.6, n=224, last 2 years)	15.3 fps ∼100% +64%
Average Intel Core i5-10500H (9.31 - 9.73, n=2)	9.52 fps ∼62% +2%
MSI GF65 Thin 10UE Intel Core i7-10750H	9.35 fps ∼61% 0%
Gigabyte G5 KC Intel Core i5-10500H	9.31 fps ∼61%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ Intel Core i5-11300H	8.3 fps ∼54% -11%
Dell G5 15 5500 09E2 Intel Core i5-10300H	6.93 fps ∼45% -26%

LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Dell G5 15 5500 09E2 Intel Core i5-10300H	92.1 s * ∼100% -82%
Average Intel Core i5-10500H (50.6 - 61.4, n=2)	56 s * ∼61% -11%
Average of class Gaming (33.6 - 332, n=219, last 2 years)	52.3 s * ∼57% -3%
Gigabyte G5 KC Intel Core i5-10500H	50.6 s * ∼55%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ Intel Core i5-11300H	50.2 s * ∼55% +1%
MSI GF65 Thin 10UE Intel Core i7-10750H	45.2 s * ∼49% +11%

R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Gigabyte G5 KC Intel Core i5-10500H	0.645 sec * ∼100%
Dell G5 15 5500 09E2 Intel Core i5-10300H	0.641 sec * ∼99% +1%
Average Intel Core i5-10500H (0.634 - 0.645, n=2)	0.64 sec * ∼99% +1%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ Intel Core i5-11300H	0.609 sec * ∼94% +6%
MSI GF65 Thin 10UE Intel Core i7-10750H	0.589 sec * ∼91% +9%
Average of class Gaming (0.412 - 4.47, n=219, last 2 years)	0.538 sec * ∼83% +17%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit

7109

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit

37125

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

13.84 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

2.1 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

1289 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

138 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

188 Points

Help

Gigabyte G5 KC在PCMark 10测试中取得了非常好的总分，它可以在我们的测试领域中领先。虽然数字内容创作和生产力的单项得分相对较高，但Essentials得分只够在测试领域中排名倒数第二。

在测试期间，这台游戏笔记本始终显示出流畅的系统运行，我们没有遇到任何微的停顿或类似情况。程序启动很快，访问文件也没有任何滞后。

PCMark 10 / Score
Average of class Gaming (4477 - 8636, n=182, last 2 years)	6947 Points ∼100% +16%
Gigabyte G5 KC GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-10500H, ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4	5968 Points ∼86%
Average Intel Core i5-10500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	5968 Points ∼86% 0%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU, i5-11300H, SK Hynix BC711 HFM512GD3HX015N	5705 Points ∼82% -4%
MSI GF65 Thin 10UE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	5390 Points ∼78% -10%
Dell G5 15 5500 09E2 GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i5-10300H, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe	4800 Points ∼69% -20%

PCMark 10 / Essentials
Average of class Gaming (7334 - 11318, n=181, last 2 years)	10123 Points ∼100% +13%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU, i5-11300H, SK Hynix BC711 HFM512GD3HX015N	9156 Points ∼90% +2%
MSI GF65 Thin 10UE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	9093 Points ∼90% +2%
Gigabyte G5 KC GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-10500H, ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4	8945 Points ∼88%
Average Intel Core i5-10500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	8945 Points ∼88% 0%
Dell G5 15 5500 09E2 GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i5-10300H, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe	8255 Points ∼82% -8%

PCMark 10 / Productivity
Average of class Gaming (6161 - 10932, n=181, last 2 years)	9140 Points ∼100% +15%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU, i5-11300H, SK Hynix BC711 HFM512GD3HX015N	8721 Points ∼95% +10%
Gigabyte G5 KC GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-10500H, ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4	7956 Points ∼87%
Average Intel Core i5-10500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	7956 Points ∼87% 0%
MSI GF65 Thin 10UE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	7729 Points ∼85% -3%
Dell G5 15 5500 09E2 GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i5-10300H, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe	6833 Points ∼75% -14%

PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Average of class Gaming (5288 - 14291, n=181, last 2 years)	9901 Points ∼100% +22%
Gigabyte G5 KC GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-10500H, ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4	8106 Points ∼82%
Average Intel Core i5-10500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	8106 Points ∼82% 0%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU, i5-11300H, SK Hynix BC711 HFM512GD3HX015N	6311 Points ∼64% -22%
MSI GF65 Thin 10UE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	6047 Points ∼61% -25%
Dell G5 15 5500 09E2 GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i5-10300H, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe	5322 Points ∼54% -34%

PCMark 10 Score		5968 points
Help

在这里使用的硬件中，技嘉G5 KC在LatencyMon的测试中显示出非常低的中断时间。这使得它非常适用于实时应用。

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Dell G5 15 5500 09E2 GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i5-10300H, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU, i5-11300H, SK Hynix BC711 HFM512GD3HX015N
MSI GF65 Thin 10UE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
Gigabyte G5 KC GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-10500H, ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4

* ... smaller is better

技嘉在G5 KC中安装了一块512GB的固态硬盘，在存储基准测试中达到了平均水平。这使该游戏笔记本处于我们测试领域的中间位置。

与其他存储设备的比较可以在我们的HDD/SSD基准测试文章中找到。

Gigabyte G5 KC
ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4

Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ
SK Hynix BC711 HFM512GD3HX015N

MSI GF65 Thin 10UE
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR

Dell G5 15 5500 09E2
Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe

Average ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

32%

-34%

Write 4K

133.7

206.1

54%

157.3

18%

89.3

-33%

131.7 ?(125.1 - 137.6, n=4)

-1%

Read 4K

46.88

77.8

66%

46.69

41.42

-12%

45.4 ?(43.5 - 46.9, n=4)

-3%

Write Seq

2509

2842

13%

2389

-5%

1182

-53%

2303 ?(2128 - 2509, n=4)

-8%

Read Seq

2209

2552

16%

2196

-1%

1532

-31%

1716 ?(1052 - 2209, n=4)

-22%

Write 4K Q32T1

373.7

583

56%

407.6

283.2

-24%

525 ?(374 - 601, n=4)

40%

Read 4K Q32T1

528

663

26%

519

-2%

353.2

-33%

581 ?(464 - 677, n=4)

10%

Write Seq Q32T1

2511

3014

20%

2401

-4%

1220

-51%

2515 ?(2501 - 2536, n=4)

Read Seq Q32T1

3440

3556

3344

-3%

2329

-32%

3417 ?(3372 - 3473, n=4)

-1%

AS SSD

-21%

-231%

-10%

Seq Read

2972

2859

-4%

3002

1776

-40%

2643 ?(2048 - 2972, n=4)

-11%

Seq Write

2276

2693

18%

2420

721

-68%

2134 ?(1530 - 2403, n=4)

-6%

4K Read

55.7

68.8

24%

48.46

-13%

38.58

-31%

48.3 ?(41.5 - 55.7, n=4)

-13%

4K Write

131.2

154.5

18%

114.3

-13%

70.9

-46%

116.4 ?(98.8 - 133.9, n=4)

-11%

4K-64 Read

1775

1860

1873

945

-47%

1586 ?(1218 - 1775, n=4)

-11%

4K-64 Write

2051

1680

-18%

1882

-8%

191.8

-91%

1975 ?(1473 - 2267, n=4)

-4%

Access Time Read *

0.091

0.043

53%

0.045

51%

0.111

-22%

0.09975 ?(0.079 - 0.131, n=4)

-10%

Access Time Write *

0.028

-0%

0.101

-261%

0.588

-2000%

0.03325 ?(0.028 - 0.039, n=4)

-19%

Score Read

2128

2214

2221

1161

-45%

1899 ?(1545 - 2128, n=4)

-11%

Score Write

2410

2104

-13%

2238

-7%

335

-86%

2305 ?(1815 - 2598, n=4)

-4%

Score Total

5595

5451

-3%

5565

-1%

2043

-63%

5151 ?(4645 - 5698, n=4)

-8%

Total Average (Program / Settings)

20% / 18%

-10% / -12%

-133% / -148%

-4% / -5%

* ... smaller is better

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3440 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2511 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 528 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 373.7 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 2209 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 2509 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 46.88 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 133.7 MB/s

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming (1925 - 45050, n=208, last 2 years)	32357 Points ∼100% +21%
Gigabyte G5 KC NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-10500H	26654 Points ∼82%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (13799 - 30772, n=35)	26424 Points ∼82% -1%
MSI GF65 Thin 10UE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-10750H	23840 Points ∼74% -11%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-11300H	16967 Points ∼52% -36%
Dell G5 15 5500 09E2 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i5-10300H	13276 Points ∼41% -50%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Gigabyte G5 KC NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-10500H	124701 Points ∼100%
Average of class Gaming (16443 - 192950, n=160, last 2 years)	117954 Points ∼95% -5%
MSI GF65 Thin 10UE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-10750H	117148 Points ∼94% -6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (33126 - 136275, n=33)	101473 Points ∼81% -19%
Dell G5 15 5500 09E2 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i5-10300H	65163 Points ∼52% -48%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-11300H	47354 Points ∼38% -62%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming (1360 - 34993, n=225, last 2 years)	24268 Points ∼100% +16%
Gigabyte G5 KC NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-10500H	21009 Points ∼87%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (16354 - 23109, n=42)	20290 Points ∼84% -3%
MSI GF65 Thin 10UE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-10750H	18434 Points ∼76% -12%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-11300H	12736 Points ∼52% -39%
Dell G5 15 5500 09E2 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i5-10300H	9833 Points ∼41% -53%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming (429 - 13835, n=225, last 2 years)	9435 Points ∼100% +18%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (6285 - 9235, n=42)	8015 Points ∼85% 0%
Gigabyte G5 KC NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-10500H	7997 Points ∼85%
MSI GF65 Thin 10UE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-10750H	7041 Points ∼75% -12%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-11300H	4888 Points ∼52% -39%
Dell G5 15 5500 09E2 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i5-10300H	3618 Points ∼38% -55%

3DMark 06 Standard Score		37418 points
3DMark 11 Performance		21277 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		38579 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		17918 points
3DMark Time Spy Score		7783 points
Help

技嘉G5 KC可以流畅地运行现代游戏，并达到高细节水平。即使在高要求的游戏中，只要以全高清分辨率进行游戏，帧率也总是在60帧以上。只有在极具挑战性的《赛博朋克2077》中，我们不得不将细节级别从 "超 "降低到 "高"，以达到60帧以上。

在其他游戏中可以预期的性能可以在我们的 GPU游戏文章中找到。

Cyberpunk 2077 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Average of class Gaming (9.5 - 85.3, n=34, last 2 years)	57 fps ∼100% +3%
Gigabyte G5 KC Intel Core i5-10500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	55.6 fps ∼98%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (48.9 - 58, n=6)	55 fps ∼96% -1%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU	29.5 (12.5min, 13.4P0.1, 20.4P1 - 71.1max) fps ∼52% -47%
Dell G5 15 5500 09E2 Intel Core i5-10300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile	22.4 (11.4min, 11.8P0.1, 18.4P1 - 47.6max) fps ∼39% -60%

Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Average of class Gaming (10.9 - 224, n=200, last 2 years)	158.3 fps ∼100% +12%
Gigabyte G5 KC Intel Core i5-10500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	141 (49.1min, 106P1 - 218max) fps ∼89%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (113 - 160.7, n=36)	136.3 fps ∼86% -3%
MSI GF65 Thin 10UE Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	121 (82.8min, 89.6P1 - 197max) fps ∼76% -14%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU	67.9 (10.4min, 14.5P1 - 279max) fps ∼43% -52%

Far Cry 5 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Average of class Gaming (12 - 162, n=151, last 2 years)	107.5 fps ∼100% +3%
Gigabyte G5 KC Intel Core i5-10500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	104 fps ∼97%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (80 - 120, n=26)	100.4 fps ∼93% -3%
MSI GF65 Thin 10UE Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	97 (78min - 115max) fps ∼90% -7%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU	74 (54min) fps ∼69% -29%

X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Average of class Gaming (12.4 - 127, n=236, last 2 years)	82.4 fps ∼100% +6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (61.9 - 107, n=41)	80.4 fps ∼98% +3%
Gigabyte G5 KC Intel Core i5-10500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	78.1 fps ∼95%
MSI GF65 Thin 10UE Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	62.2 fps ∼75% -20%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU	57.7 fps ∼70% -26%

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Average of class Gaming (9.13 - 140.6, n=199, last 2 years)	89.4 fps ∼100% +14%
Gigabyte G5 KC Intel Core i5-10500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	78.5 fps ∼88%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (64.4 - 91.9, n=35)	78.4 fps ∼88% 0%
MSI GF65 Thin 10UE Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	70.3 fps ∼79% -10%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU	48.6 (29min) fps ∼54% -38%

Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (90.7 - 154.7, n=42)	124.3 fps ∼100% +8%
Average of class Gaming (22 - 170.5, n=237, last 2 years)	123.9 fps ∼100% +8%
Gigabyte G5 KC Intel Core i5-10500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	115 (96.6min) fps ∼93%
MSI GF65 Thin 10UE Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	90.7 (76.9min) fps ∼73% -21%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU	88.1 (78.8min) fps ∼71% -23%

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming (8.61 - 130.6, n=220, last 2 years)	91.6 fps ∼100% +13%
Gigabyte G5 KC Intel Core i5-10500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	80.8 (64min) fps ∼88%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (58.2 - 91.5, n=41)	76.5 fps ∼84% -5%
MSI GF65 Thin 10UE Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	68.7 (63min - 74max) fps ∼75% -15%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU	48.7 fps ∼53% -40%
Dell G5 15 5500 09E2 Intel Core i5-10300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile	34.7 (8.09min, 8.67P0.1, 28.2P1 - 154max) fps ∼38% -57%

GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Average of class Gaming (4.18 - 139.2, n=205, last 2 years)	91.8 fps ∼100% +5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (69.2 - 108.7, n=39)	88.4 fps ∼96% +1%
Gigabyte G5 KC Intel Core i5-10500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	87.4 (4.5min, 58.8P1 - 167max) fps ∼95%
MSI GF65 Thin 10UE Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	69.2 (4.86min, 47.6P1 - 137max) fps ∼75% -21%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU	63.9 (6.93min, 41.7P1 - 126max) fps ∼70% -27%

我们用TheWitcher 3进行的耐力负荷测试表明，来自技嘉的游戏笔记本电脑确实在帧率方面有轻微的波动，但即使在很长一段时间内，它总能再次稳定下来。

0510152025303540455055606570 7580Tooltip

噪声

技嘉G5 KC的风扇在负载下发出均匀的噪音，可以明显听到。因此，在游戏或使用高要求的应用程序时，噪音水平非常高。然而，在桌面上使用办公程序和互联网浏览器中的几个打开的标签时，G5基本上是安静或无声的--除了零星的升压阶段。

我们无法确定任何其他背景噪音，如线圈啸叫或类似的声音。

Noise Level

Idle		31 / 32 / 51 dB(A)
Load		57 / 58 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 27 dB(A)

dB(A)01020304050 60708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs20 34.333.138.435.336.32535.232.337.933.93531 4841.647.443.743.74034.827.530.4 28.732.25038.430.430.723.33863 38.13331.326.736.58047.925.62120.547.810030.626.120.119.131.512531.727.722.220.431.816031.128.921.919.630.920032.930.122.5 21.23425035.432.321.420.13531540.5372119.338.240038.83522.317.639.450041.436.921.616.941.963042.737.121.615.742.680044.538.222.114.444.9100046.740.52315.347.512504840.422.916.248.5 160047.441.220.416.448200046.840.5 18.615.747.2250048.841.917.614.249315046.940.116.113.547.3400045.33815.21345500042.837.214.312.542.9630040.634.315.312.440.98000 35.6281412.336.31000032.32414.812.232.91250026.719.113.811.6 26.91600022.617.115.310.822SPL57.5 50.931.52757.9N11.67.41.50.911.7median 40.6median 36.9median 20.4median 15.7median 40.9Delta6.763.23.16.1hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseGigabyte G5 KC

在高达50°C（约122°F）的温度下，技嘉G5的表面温度可以变得相当高。由于这只是在我们非常苛刻的压力测试中出现的情况，但你不应该期望在日常使用甚至游戏时有如此高的温度。此外，掌托的温度始终保持适度。

在我们苛刻的耐力压力测试中，笔记本内部的温度攀升至91℃（约196°F）。在此期间，CPU被保持在2.5GHz左右，这意味着它没有低于基本的时钟速度。

在我们的TheWitcher 3 测试中，温度短暂上升到98℃（约208°F）。在整个游戏测试过程中，时钟速率保持在3.1GHz左右。因此，用户不应该期望由于温度过高而受到限制，即使是在重度系统负载下。


49 °C	49 °C	50 °C
46 °C	46 °C	47 °C
42 °C	36 °C	35 °C

Maximum: 50 °C
Average: 44.4 °C


48 °C	44 °C	49 °C
45 °C	47 °C	48 °C
32 °C	38 °C	44 °C

Maximum: 49 °C
Average: 43.9 °C

Power Supply (max.) 53 °C | Room Temperature 24 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 44.4 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 50 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 43.3 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.9 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 42.8 °C / 109 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 42 °C / 107.6 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 29.1 °C / 84.4 F (-12.9 °C / -23.2 F).

发言人

G5 KC的扬声器提供相对较高的音量和具有明显中、高音的声谱。这使得它们相当适合媒体播放，但在游戏中，例如，应首选耳机或外部扬声器。

dB(A)0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.335.82533.934.13143.744.34028.731.65023.339.66326.733.78020.528.710019.121.612520.42216019.62420021.233.725020.152.231519.360.240017.659.250016.96363015.767.180014.4 73.1100015.376.5125016.269.1160016.466.7200015.768.3250014.271.1315013.573 40001379500012.574.8630012.466.3800012.362.71000012.260.61250011.659.51600010.859.4SPL2784.6N 0.957.2median 15.7median 63Delta3.19.33734.53729.328.429.33326.7332522.32527.825.527.834.724.434.729.429.629.4 24.223.724.230.128.430.143.321.243.356.219.656.263.218.863.262.920.762.963.52063.566.520.366.572.921.972.975.422.875.468.72568.766.224.266.269.524.669.566.72266.759.119.459.160.218.860.267.61867.663.915.463.965.213.365.267.514.967.57214.4 7273.512.973.567.413.467.480.733.180.750.41.750.4median 66.2median 20median 66.25.52.85.5hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseGigabyte G5 KCMSI GF65 Thin 10UE

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Gigabyte G5 KC audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.4% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (16.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 91% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 7% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 78% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 17% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

MSI GF65 Thin 10UE audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.6% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (16.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 46% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 28% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Gigabyte G5 KC - 电源适配器

根据我们的测量，技嘉G5 KC的最大功耗可以攀升到242瓦。在我们的TheWitcher 3 耐力测试中，功耗相对稳定在166瓦左右，在空闲情况下达到13瓦。虽然负载下的比率高于我们用NvidiaGeForce RTX 3060 测试的其他设备的平均水平，但在空闲情况下，比率较低。

根据标签，附带的电源适配器提供180瓦的输出；因此，当涉及到处理消费高峰时，其容量有点紧张。

	Gigabyte G5 KC i5-10500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ i5-11300H, GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU	MSI GF65 Thin 10UE i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	Average of class Gaming
Power Consumption		33%	18%	-6%	-32%
Idle Minimum *	8	4 50%	5.4 32%	9.81 ?(5 - 22.8, n=34) -23%	14 ?(3 - 64, n=169, last 2 years) -75%
Idle Average *	13	9 31%	12.8 2%	14 ?(8.3 - 26.5, n=34) -8%	18.8 ?(6.5 - 68.2, n=169, last 2 years) -45%
Idle Maximum *	20	15 25%	19.5 2%	21 ?(11.8 - 41, n=34) -5%	26.6 ?(8.9 - 76, n=168, last 2 years) -33%
Load Average *	98	85 13%	86.6 12%	107.5 ?(48.4 - 191, n=34) -10%	111.3 ?(45.9 - 202, n=169, last 2 years) -14%
Witcher 3 ultra *	166	104 37%	115.7 30%
Load Maximum *	242	135 44%	175.2 28%	201 ?(131.6 - 251, n=34) 17%	226 ?(63 - 401, n=169, last 2 years) 7%

* ... smaller is better

0102030405060708090100 110120130140150160170Tooltip

在我们的实际Wi-Fi测试中，技嘉G5 KC实现了3:35小时的运行时间。这意味着它不像我们测试领域中的其他游戏笔记本电脑那样持续时间长。紧随其后的是微星GF65 Thin 10UE ，不过它的电池容量略大，为51Wh（而不是G5 KC的49Wh）。

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		5h 14min
WiFi Websurfing		3h 35min
Load (maximum brightness)		1h 04min

	Gigabyte G5 KC i5-10500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 48.96 Wh	Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ i5-11300H, GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU, 57 Wh	MSI GF65 Thin 10UE i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 51 Wh	Dell G5 15 5500 09E2 i5-10300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, 51 Wh	Average of class Gaming
Battery Runtime		120%	47%	105%	66%
Reader / Idle	314	1041 232%	667 112%	730 132%	594 ?(57 - 1262, n=101, last 2 years) 89%
WiFi v1.3	215	432 101%	276 28%	381.9 78%	365 ?(57 - 710, n=168, last 2 years) 70%
Load	64	82 28%	65 2%		88.2 ?(36 - 228, n=147, last 2 years) 38%
Witcher 3 ultra				74	75.7 ?(45 - 131, n=17, last 2 years)

Pros

+ 非常好的维护选项

+ 良好的CPU/GPU性能

+ 144赫兹显示

+ 无需工具即可更换电池

Cons

- 负载下的高噪音水平

- 中等的电池寿命

- 外壳相对较厚

在审查中。Gigabyte G5 KC。测试设备由德国Gigabyte公司提供。

技嘉G5 KC主要能做一件事：把现代游戏流畅地带到屏幕上。后者以丰富的色彩和144赫兹的刷新率显示出其良好的一面，英特尔酷睿i5-10500H在长时间内也能提供稳定的性能。内置的NvidiaGeForce RTX 3060，没有利用最大可能的TGP，但它也提供了良好的效果，特别是与其他预算游戏笔记本电脑相比，如MSI GF65 Thin 10UE 。

流畅地玩最新的游戏，对于价格低廉的技嘉G5 KC来说不是问题。

在维护选项方面，即使是价格更高的对手也可以从技嘉的书中吸取经验。除了系统固态硬盘外，还有第二个M.2插槽和一个2.5英寸驱动器的空闲插槽。你甚至可以在不需要工具的情况下更换电池，尽管它只能提供中等的运行时间。

这款游戏笔记本的低价在箱子的尺寸上也很明显。但如果你只是在寻找一个具有强大硬件的预算设备，你肯定不会选择技嘉G5 KC。

Gigabyte G5 KC - 09/02/2021 v7
Mike Wobker

Connectivity

67 / 80 → 84%

Application Performance

90%

Gaming - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Translator: Stefan Hinum - Founder, CEO, CFO - 18990 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2006

Mike Wobker, 2021-09- 3 (Update: 2021-09- 3)

gigabyte g5 gd评价技嘉 G5 技嘉 G5 KD 华哥电脑

Gigabyte G5 KD 好用吗

键盘

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Gigabyte G5 KC audio analysis

MSI GF65 Thin 10UE audio analysis

Pros

Cons

Pricecompare

相關文章

太陽能發電設備

美国cpi数据预测

我終於失去了你吉他譜

酸痛貼布寄台灣

哈雷sportster s价格

楼下的房客努努

最好的我们简介

斗昌和白昌价钱

Arcoxia 中文

Acer Swift 3 怎么样

廣告

最新消息

神魔之塔光队 2022

遠雄海洋公園門票價格

股票損益計算

寶麗萊車CAM

我怎么这么好看drama

奥数比赛2022

北海岸活蝦之家

Shopee在中国叫什么？

莫桑石钻石区别

樓梯尺寸

廣告

Populer

廣告

關於

合法的

幫助

社會的

Gigabyte G5 KD 好 用 吗

键盘

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Gigabyte G5 KC audio analysis

MSI GF65 Thin 10UE audio analysis

Pros

Cons

Pricecompare

相關文章

廣告

最新消息

廣告

Populer

廣告

關於

合法的

幫助

社會的

Gigabyte G5 KD 好用吗